the fate of java.dyn

[Mark Roos]

I am ready to make the change myself, go for it.

Where will the anonymousClassLoader end up?

mark



From:
John Rose <john.r.rose at oracle.com>
To:
Da Vinci Machine Project <mlvm-dev at openjdk.java.net>
Date:
03/28/2011 01:03 PM
Subject:
the fate of java.dyn
Sent by:
mlvm-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net



OpenJDK b135 has JVM support for the new package name java.dyn.invoke, and 
therefore the new API names can be used with a b135 JVM plus a suitable 
-Xbootclasspath patch.  In b136 or b137 the JDK changes will follow, so it 
will work "out of the box".

Here's my question:  Does anybody care if we delete JVM support for 
java.dyn in the very next OpenJDK build?  That's what we'd prefer to do.

-- John
_______________________________________________
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev at openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/mlvm-dev/attachments/20110328/be407932/attachment.html