bug in MacroAssembler::check_method_handle_type for x86

Christian Thalinger christian.thalinger at oracle.com
Mon Apr 2 07:45:01 PDT 2012


On Mar 29, 2012, at 7:25 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:

> 
> On Mar 28, 2012, at 7:31 PM, John Rose wrote:
> 
>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 8:17 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
>> 
>>> John, I think there is a bug in MacroAssembler::check_method_handle_type for x86 (with meth-lazy):
>> 
>> That's correct.  Thanks for noticing it; I'll push a fix.  — John
> 
> The weird thing is that when I implement it correctly on SPARC I get:
> 
> MH _invokeBasic mh=0x00000007ab4a4fc0 saved_sp=0xffffffff7dcfb681 args=0xffffffff7dcfbf40
> MethodHandle:(Ltest/java/lang/invoke/MethodHandlesTest$HasFields;)Z : #( *** unrecognized MH type }
> =============== DEBUG MESSAGE: _invokeBasic ================
> 
> But it worked with the broken version.

Today I tried this again and it also fails on x86 (seems I didn't update the VM the last time).  I think the reason for this is that we also have to load the basicType of mtype and compare these two:

    // fetch mtype.form.basicType                                                                                                           
    load_heap_oop(Address(mtype_reg, delayed_value(java_lang_invoke_MethodType::form_offset_in_bytes,          temp3_reg)), temp2_reg);     
    load_heap_oop(Address(temp2_reg, delayed_value(java_lang_invoke_MethodTypeForm::basicType_offset_in_bytes, temp3_reg)), temp2_reg);     
    // fetch mh.type.form.basicType                                                                                                         
    load_heap_oop(Address(temp_reg,  delayed_value(java_lang_invoke_MethodType::form_offset_in_bytes,          temp3_reg)), temp_reg);      
    load_heap_oop(Address(temp_reg,  delayed_value(java_lang_invoke_MethodTypeForm::basicType_offset_in_bytes, temp3_reg)), temp_reg);      
    cmp_and_brx_short(temp_reg, temp2_reg, Assembler::notEqual, Assembler::pn, wrong_method_type);                                         

Correct?

-- Chris

> 
> -- Chris
> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> mlvm-dev mailing list
>> mlvm-dev at openjdk.java.net
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mlvm-dev mailing list
> mlvm-dev at openjdk.java.net
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev



More information about the mlvm-dev mailing list