JVM Summit Wrokshop/talk request

[Mark Roos]

I would love to put it together, but my knowledge is minimal.  I don't 
mind the
organizing part but I think we need some folks from the jvm side to be the 
main
speaker/know it all(s).

So if we can get some volunteers to be the experts I will gladly propose 
and mc
a workshop/panel

mark




From:   Charles Oliver Nutter <headius at headius.com>
To:     Da Vinci Machine Project <mlvm-dev at openjdk.java.net>
Date:   04/08/2013 12:26 PM
Subject:        Re: JVM Summit Wrokshop/talk request
Sent by:        mlvm-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net



Indeed...I think we need to get all us invokedynamicists into the same
room to better understand what's working, what's not, and where to go
from here. Consider me in.

I'm sure it would be accepted, so a proposal would probably be a
formality...but do you want to throw something together, Mark?

- Charlie

On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Mark Roos <mroos at roos.com> wrote:
> It seems like quite a bit of work is going on around improving the
> performance of invokeDynamic.
> It would be interesting ( at least to me ) to have an in depth 
discussion of
> what is being done and
> how I should adjust my usage to get the best performance for a dynamic
> language.
>
> I'll buy the drinks
>
> mark
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mlvm-dev mailing list
> mlvm-dev at openjdk.java.net
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
>
_______________________________________________
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev at openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/mlvm-dev/attachments/20130408/c66f9547/attachment.html