another question about megamorphic call sites in combination with MethodHandles
Remi Forax
forax at univ-mlv.fr
Fri Mar 22 02:35:04 PDT 2013
On 03/22/2013 10:24 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> Am 22.03.2013 10:11, schrieb Remi Forax:
> [...]
>> I don't think it's a good idea to expose directly method handles to users,
>> it's better to encapsulate it into a Groovy object corresponding to a
>> function or a closure so you can add a bunch of invoke overloads.
> what invoke overloads are you thinking of here?
traditionnal ones,
invoke(Object)
invoke(Object,Object)
...
invoke(Object...)
>
> bye blackdrag
>
cheers,
Rémi
More information about the mlvm-dev
mailing list