Number of Apps per JVM

[Laurent Daynes]

You may also consider IBM's multi-tenant JVM:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-multitenant-java/index.html?ca=drs

It's a rehash of MVM from the SunLab's Barcelona project  10 years ago 
(e.g., see 
http://www.digitalcld.com/cld/emerging-technology-ibms-remarkable-multi-tenant-cloud-jvm-for-java-8).

Laurent


On 1/13/14 12:16 AM, Ben Evans wrote:
>
> You might want to take a look at the Waratek JVM - it has an 
> interesting approach to this problem.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ben
>
> On 12 Jan 2014 23:15, "Mark Roos" <mroos at roos.com 
> <mailto:mroos at roos.com>> wrote:
>
>     From Charles
>             I forgot to mention: more and more users are going with
>     exactly one
>            JRuby runtime per app, and most Ruby folks deploy one app
>     in a given
>
>     I have been pondering the merits of apps with a shared jvm (
>     protection is provided via a
>     sandbox) vs independent jvms per app.  Since they are all
>     communicating via messages the
>     thought of avoiding serialization is appealing.  I am looking at
>     the Kilim approach to object
>     isolation which adds some complexity but does support the concept
>     of passing ownership
>     of objects between the sandboxes (Actors).
>
>     Any others have thoughts on how one might best do this 'Erlang'
>     like approach?
>
>     thx
>     mark
>     _______________________________________________
>     mlvm-dev mailing list
>     mlvm-dev at openjdk.java.net <mailto:mlvm-dev at openjdk.java.net>
>     http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mlvm-dev mailing list
> mlvm-dev at openjdk.java.net
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/mlvm-dev/attachments/20140113/26cd3387/attachment-0001.html