[9, 8u40] RFR (XXS): 8059880: Get rid of LambdaForm interpretation

Vladimir Kozlov vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com
Wed Nov 19 17:20:51 UTC 2014


As far as I can guess :) this change looks good. Reviewed.

Thanks,
Vladimir

On 11/19/14 2:24 AM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
> Aleksey, Duncan, thanks for the review and the confirmation that it doesn't break stuff for you.
>
> Any Reviews, please? :-)
>
> Best regards,
> Vladimir Ivanov
>
> On 11/19/14, 2:23 PM, MacGregor, Duncan (GE Energy Management) wrote:
>> On 18/11/2014 23:33, "Aleksey Shipilev" <aleksey.shipilev at oracle.com>
>> wrote:
>>> On 11/19/2014 12:01 AM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vlivanov/8059880/webrev.00/
>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8059880
>>>
>>> Yes, for the love of God, GO FOR IT.
>>
>> Seconded. Startup of our stuff seems fine now with a compile threshold of
>> zero, and it will make stacks so much easier to read in the debugger. :-)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mlvm-dev mailing list
>> mlvm-dev at openjdk.java.net
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> mlvm-dev mailing list
> mlvm-dev at openjdk.java.net
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev


More information about the mlvm-dev mailing list