Defining anonymous classes

[Remi Forax]

On 08/14/2014 12:52 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Is there an end-user accessible way of defining anonymous classes (by 
> which I mean classes which are kept alive only by explicit references 
> or their instances, and not their class loader)?
>
> Searching for the term "anonymous classes" isn't particularly 
> revealing due to the Java-level language construct of the same name.
>

Re-reading this thread, I think i've forgotten to mention an important 
thing,
defineAnonymousClass also *do not* verify that the provided bytecode is 
legal,
it's important because skipping bytecode verification allow to skip the 
creation of
StackMap frames when generating bytecodes which is an important speedup 
factor
if your runtime as no interpreter.

cheers,
Rémi