[8u-dev] Review request : JDK-8068416: LFGarbageCollectedTest.java fails with OOME: "GC overhead limit exceeded"

Konstantin Shefov konstantin.shefov at oracle.com
Thu Jun 4 10:50:46 UTC 2015


Vladimir

In all cases when OOME happens the test operates with 
BoundMethodHandle$SpeciesData class, so it indeed may be caused by 
JDK-8078602.

But is it a good idea of excluding the test? LFGarbageCollectedTest.java 
fails not every time and may catch other product issues if they happen.
We can just leave it unchanged and close JDK-8068416 as a duplicate of 
JDK-8078602.

-Konstantin

On 06/04/2015 12:50 PM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
> Konstantin,
>
> Have you looked into the heap dump to understand why the test provokes 
> an OOM? Limiting test iterations is counter-productive, because it 
> defeats the purpose of the test.
>
> Probably, the failure is caused by BMHs which aren't collected (see 
> JDK-8078602 [1]). In that case I'd prefer the test to be excluded 
> until BMHs are converted to VM anonymous classes.
>
> Best regards,
> Vladimir Ivanov
>
> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8078602
>
> On 6/4/15 12:10 PM, Konstantin Shefov wrote:
>> Igor,
>>
>> It seems I have given you wrong information. This test fails with OOME
>> against JDK 9 also, I managed to reproduce the failure now.
>> It was hard to reproduce it because of randomness, I need to rerun the
>> test 50 times. Although the test seems to fail with OOME more often
>> against JDK 8u, but I think it is just factor of randomness in the test.
>>
>> So I do not think it is a product bug then.
>>
>> -Konstantin
>>
>> On 06/03/2015 11:47 PM, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
>>> Konstantin,
>>>
>>> do you have an explanation why the test passes on jdk 9?
>>> from my point of view, it indicates there is a product bug in 8u which
>>> should be fixed and your fix just hides it.
>>>
>>> Igor
>>>
>>> On 06/03/2015 10:14 PM, Seán Coffey wrote:
>>>> I bumped into this failure myself today. I think you've got a typo.
>>>> 440 should be 40. Looks like a good approach otherwise.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Sean.
>>>>
>>>> On 03/06/2015 17:33, Konstantin Shefov wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please review the test bug fix
>>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8068416
>>>>> Webrev is http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kshefov/8068416/webrev.00/
>>>>> Test fails only against JDK 8u and passes against JDK 9.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fix is to reduce the number of iterations to 40. With that number of
>>>>> iterations the test passes on those hosts where it failed before.
>>>>> The number of iterations the test start to fail is 65.
>>>>> Before the fix the number of iterations was 84.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> -Konstantin
>>>>
>>



More information about the mlvm-dev mailing list