What can we improve in JSR292 for Java 9?

Charles Oliver Nutter headius at headius.com
Wed Mar 4 22:50:31 UTC 2015


On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:27 AM, Jochen Theodorou <blackdrag at gmx.org> wrote:
> my biggest request: allow the call of a super constructor (like
> super(foo,bar)) using MethodHandles an have it understood by the JVM like a
> normal super constructor call... same for this(...)

Just so I understand...the problem is that unless you can get a Lookup
that can do the super call from Java (i.e. from within a subclass),
you can't get a handle that can do the super call, right? And you
can't do that because the method bodies might not be emitted into a
natural subclass of the super class?

- Charlie


More information about the mlvm-dev mailing list