ClassValue perf?

[Michael Haupt]

Hi Peter,

thank you for this wonderful piece of work.

> Am 26.05.2016 um 10:59 schrieb Peter Levart <peter.levart at gmail.com>:
> How does this implementation compare on your hardware, Michael?

Results attached. It improves on the unpatched version in all cases, is in most cases even faster than the "simple solution" (reduce initial size to 1), and reduces complexity of ClassValue. It passes all open and closed jli-related tests as well as the Nashorn tests. Looking really good.

Let me run the full internal test suite across platforms.

Best,

Michael



-- 

 <http://www.oracle.com/>
Dr. Michael Haupt | Principal Member of Technical Staff
Phone: +49 331 200 7277 | Fax: +49 331 200 7561
Oracle Java Platform Group | LangTools Team | Nashorn
Oracle Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Schiffbauergasse 14 | 14467 Potsdam, Germany

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Hauptverwaltung: Riesstraße 25, D-80992 München
Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603

Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. | Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Nederland, Nr. 30143697
Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher
 <http://www.oracle.com/commitment>	Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/mlvm-dev/attachments/20160526/7ee1f971/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: results.txt
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/mlvm-dev/attachments/20160526/7ee1f971/results.txt>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/mlvm-dev/attachments/20160526/7ee1f971/attachment-0001.html>