Get nashron work in opnjdk8
Harsha Kumara
harsz89 at gmail.com
Fri Feb 8 08:22:21 PST 2013
Thanks for the presentations resources.I downloaded latest rhino version
and load crypto file into the rhino and nashorn seperately and run the
encrypt method.
In rhino when i repeatedly run the encrypt method in the consolde I got
this results
js> encrypt();
54
js> encrypt();
33
js> encrypt();
27
js> encrypt();
46
js> encrypt();
28
js> encrypt();
25
js> encrypt();
35
js> encrypt();
28
js> encrypt();
27
js> encrypt();
23
js> encrypt();
26
js> encrypt();
17
js> encrypt();
24
js> encrypt();
23
js> encrypt();
26
And when I run it in the nashorn
jjs> encrypt();
153
jjs> encrypt();
125
jjs> encrypt();
118
jjs> encrypt();
114
jjs> encrypt();
139
jjs> encrypt();
53
jjs> encrypt();
51
jjs> encrypt();
56
jjs> encrypt();
49
jjs> encrypt();
49
jjs> encrypt();
47
jjs> encrypt();
72
jjs> encrypt();
46
jjs> encrypt();
36
jjs> encrypt();
25
jjs> encrypt();
27
jjs> encrypt();
36
jjs> encrypt();
31
jjs> encrypt();
26
jjs> encrypt();
25
jjs> encrypt();
24
jjs> encrypt();
25
jjs> encrypt();
33
jjs> encrypt();
40
jjs> encrypt();
27
jjs> encrypt();
27
jjs> encrypt();
26
jjs> encrypt();
103
jjs> encrypt();
134
jjs> encrypt();
40
jjs> encrypt();
23
jjs> encrypt();
26
jjs> encrypt();
27
jjs> encrypt();
26
jjs> encrypt();
28
jjs> encrypt();
24
I have got this variate results.I have attach the crypto file.Any idea is
this why this varying?
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Marcus Lagergren <
marcus.lagergren at oracle.com> wrote:
> Actually, Nashorn currently beats v8 on the splay benchmark in the Octane
> suite, but for pure number crunching tests like crypto we are still behind,
> as we don't have the luxury of our own native value representation -
> producing strongly typed Java byte code is rather high level for a runtime.
> We have several tricks up our sleeve though, both on the JVM side and in
> Nashorn itself, so this gap is expected to get smaller.
>
> If you want to know more about how to implement dynamic languages on the
> JVM and get some performance out of it, I did a presentation at Devoxx last
> November that is freely available online.
> http://www.devoxx.com/display/DV12/Nashorn++Optimizing+JavaScript+and+Dynamic+Language+Execution+on+the+JVM
>
> Regards
> Marcus
>
> On Feb 8, 2013, at 4:04 PM, Harsha Kumara <harsz89 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Yeap.I have build the nashron by checkout it.I'll run tests again compare
> > with rhino.I went through some articles and some of articles express that
> > nashorn is faster and perform well than v8 java script engine.But the
> > performance of the v8 is still higher than the nashorn I guess.I did some
> > bechmark test with v8 and nashorn.So far v8 perform well.Am I correct?are
> > there a any ways to tune nashorn to perform faster?
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Hannes Wallnoefer <
> > hannes.wallnoefer at oracle.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Am 2013-02-08 15:00, schrieb Harsha Kumara:
> >>
> >> I have locally build openjdk8 forest.Then I set java home to jdk8 which
> was
> >> build from my local build.I think the way i ran jjs is not correct.Using
> >> consoe I ran ./jjs then I got the console.Afterthat I manually load
> >> javascript file using load function (ed:load("foo.js")) and call the
> >> function.Is that correct?
> >>
> >>
> >> If you were able to load and run JavaScript you probably did everything
> >> right.
> >>
> >> However, if you just want to play with Nashorn the simpler option may be
> >> to use an official JDK preview release from
> >> http://jdk8.java.net/download.html. You can use the following command
> to
> >> just get the Nashhorn sources:
> >>
> >> hg clone http://hg.openjdk.java.net/nashorn/jdk8/nashorn nashorn
> >>
> >> Hannes
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Marcus Lagergren <
> marcus.lagergren at oracle.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Can you tell us how you run it in JJS?
> >>
> >> For the best current Nashorn performance, any build over Java8 b74
> should
> >> be used, as it contains significant fixes to the inlining in the JVM.
> >> You probably need to give any microbenchmark a few warmup rounds for
> >> performance to stabilize. If you only run one round, there will be too
> much
> >> noise and warmup issues for results to be meaningful. This is especially
> >> true with invoke dynamic based programs running on Java 8 now, as they
> >> tend to warm up slower than standard "Java" programs.
> >>
> >> Running with the octane test harness in the Nashorn repo (modified to
> >> provide multiple rounds for VM warmup)
> >> (after doing ant externals to get the benchmarks)
> >>
> >> java -jar dist/nashorn.jar test/script/basic/run-octane.js --
> >> test/script/external/octane/crypto.js --iterations 10 --verbose
> >>
> >> I get ~2000 points on my machine, where Rhino gives me ~850 points.
> >>
> >>
> >> /M
> >>
> >>
> >> On Feb 8, 2013, at 2:29 PM, Harsha Kumara <harsz89 at gmail.com> <
> harsz89 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Yeah the problem is i'm not quite sure whether I have configure the
> >>
> >> nashorn
> >>
> >> correctly.I had run crypto test in v8 bench mark test suit in jjs
> console
> >> it gives around 110ms to run the encryption operation where rhino just
> >>
> >> take
> >>
> >> around 31ms.My concern is how can I know whether I have correctly
> >>
> >> configure
> >>
> >> nashorn in my machine.
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 6:52 PM, A. Sundararajan <
> sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> [Please reply to list as it will be record for similar queries from
> >>
> >> others
> >>
> >> as well]
> >>
> >> You said it is not as fast as rhino on your test. Is it possible to
> >>
> >> share
> >>
> >> your test or reduced version of it demonstrating performance issue?
> >>
> >> thanks
> >> -Sundar
> >>
> >>
> >> On Friday 08 February 2013 06:15 PM, Harsha Kumara wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> I have pull jdk8 and build it.Then I build nashron after setting java
> >> home poiting to the jdk8.But ant build return with a javadoc error.I
> >>
> >> have
> >>
> >> the nashron jar which is build during the ant build.And I ran jjs
> >> executable with a some test it's not fast as rhino.I wonder whether I
> >>
> >> need
> >>
> >> to other configuration to get nashron into play?
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:59 PM, A. Sundararajan
> <sundararajan.athijegannathan@**oracle.com<
> >>
> >> sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com><mailto:
> >>
> >> sundararajan.**athijegannathan at oracle.com<
> >>
> >> sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com>>>
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Nashorn has not yet hit the openjdk8 main repo. You need to pull
> >> nashorn forest for now:
> >>
> >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/**nashorn/jdk8<
> >>
> >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/nashorn/jdk8>
> >>
> >> It'll be some time before nashorn hits main jdk8 repo. But, you
> >> can pull the above forest in the interim and build it.
> >>
> >> -Sundar
> >>
> >>
> >> On Friday 08 February 2013 02:07 PM, Harsha Kumara wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi!
> >> I had tried to run some performance tests.But results are not
> >> impressive
> >> than I thought.I have build openjdk8 and set JAVA_HOME to
> >> it.Then I have
> >> build nashron.But when I run the jrunscript -q it still show
> >> the rhino as
> >> underline javascript engine.Then how can I configure it to use
> >> nashron?
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> /Harsha Kumara/
> >> /Undergraduate/
> >> /Department of Computer Science and Engineering/
> >> /University of Moratuwa/
> >> /Sri Lanka./
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> *Harsha Kumara*
> >> *Undergraduate*
> >> *Department of Computer Science and Engineering*
> >> *University of Moratuwa*
> >> *Sri Lanka.*
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Harsha Kumara*
> > *Undergraduate*
> > *Department of Computer Science and Engineering*
> > *University of Moratuwa*
> > *Sri Lanka.*
>
>
--
*Harsha Kumara*
*Undergraduate*
*Department of Computer Science and Engineering*
*University of Moratuwa*
*Sri Lanka.*
More information about the nashorn-dev
mailing list