Docs/examples for JSAdapter

[Tal Liron]

Rick, have you considered writing a wrapper library in pure JavaScript 
over the harsher Java-written API? Users won't even have to know that 
Java is being called behind the scenes.

It's much more natural to write such things in JavaScript, and it would 
also be more portable to other JS engines (Rhino). I've done this quite 
a bit!

On 10/23/2013 12:58 AM, Rick Bullotta wrote:
> I totally agree on the benefit of calling Java directly.  I just want to create a seamless DSL for my users.
>
> So subclassing JSObject is the only way it seems (e.g. an interface-based approach wouldn't work).  What about a hybrid interface + annotation based approach?   Annotate the class to tell it to dynalink, and have an interface that implements getMember, getSlot, etc...
>
> Is that possible?
>