Review request for JDK-8067774
Attila Szegedi
attila.szegedi at oracle.com
Thu Dec 18 09:54:54 UTC 2014
Yeah, I accidentally uploaded it to a wrong URL. It's now available at the right URL too.
On Dec 18, 2014, at 10:34 AM, Marcus Lagergren <marcus.lagergren at oracle.com> wrote:
> By the way - the correct URL for the review is:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~attila/8067774/webrev.8u-dev/ <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~attila/8067774/webrev.8u-dev/>
>
> /M
>
>> On 18 Dec 2014, at 09:59, Marcus Lagergren <marcus.lagergren at oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>> You’re welcome! :-) We’re doing what we can to respond quickly, Guillaume.
>>
>> If you want to track the integration of the fix you can check the CR in JIRA for updates.
>>
>> Regards
>> Marcus
>>
>>> On 17 Dec 2014, at 18:43, Guillaume Grossetie <grossetieg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Excellent news!! Thanks for this bugfix :)
>>>
>>> Le 17 déc. 2014 18:04, "Marcus Lagergren" <marcus.lagergren at oracle.com <mailto:marcus.lagergren at oracle.com>> a écrit :
>>> Well this was significantly smaller than I thought and also a simplication from the previous implementation. Well done for a bugfix!
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> /M
>>>
>>>> On 17 Dec 2014, at 17:45, Attila Szegedi <attila.szegedi at oracle.com <mailto:attila.szegedi at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Please review JDK-8067774 at <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~attila/8067774/webrev.00 <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~attila/8067774/webrev.00>> for <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8067774 <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8067774>>
>>>>
>>>> This fixes the issue reported with asciidoctor. The change is not trivial – I had to introduce a change in the way LocalVariableTypeCalculator performs its expression type calculations; it now uses a type stack. (If I want to be honest, I should have realized this is the right way to implement it from the beginning… Oh well, live and learn.) As a beneficial consequence, a lot of code actually became simpler; the whole business with using a Symbol->Type function to evaluate expression types is no longer necessary (all changes in the various expression classes are to do with removal of that logic).
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Attila.
>>>
>>
>
More information about the nashorn-dev
mailing list