The class cache

[Hannes Wallnoefer]

Am 2014-03-12 12:44, schrieb Tal Liron:
> Hannes, I would like to test this.
>
> It doesn't seem to be on the main Nashorn repository: 
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/nashorn/jdk8/nashorn
>
> Is there a separate repository I should be using?

You can get it here:

http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn

In case you have problems with building I can send you a nashorn.jar via 
private mail. Just let me know.

Hannes

> On 03/12/2014 05:50 PM, Hannes Wallnoefer wrote:
>> Hi Tal,
>>
>> I'm right now pushing a change for JDK-8021350 that allows sharing 
>> script classes between global scopes. Currently, script classes are 
>> bound to the global object in various ways, so the change is not 
>> trivial, and it's not possible to share compiled scripts between 
>> global scopes with the nashorn.jar in current JDK8 builds. The script 
>> sharing feature is planned for the 8u20 release.
>>
>> The class sharing will be per script engine, meaning that if you use 
>> multiple scopes with one script engine classes will be reused, when 
>> you use multiple script engines scripts will be recompiled for each 
>> engine.
>>
>> I'd be interested to know whether this would work for you. If you'd 
>> like to test the class sharing feature I can help you getting started.
>>
>> Hannes
>>
>> Am 2014-03-12 10:27, schrieb Tal Liron:
>>> In Nashorn, the ClassCache is set per Global instance.
>>>
>>> This is fine if your application has only one global instance. 
>>> However, my application design involves creating many Global 
>>> instances. (Actually, I create and destroy them on the fly per user 
>>> request in an HTTP server scenario.) The problem is that all code 
>>> has to constantly be recompiled, and the cache is essentially never 
>>> used. Since recompilation is so very expensive in Nashorn, this 
>>> results in awful performance.
>>>
>>> How can I implement a shared ClassCache? I can't extend and modify 
>>> Global behavior, because it's a final class.
>>>
>>> I've tried to cache ScriptFunction instances myself, but I get 
>>> exceptions when I try to run them with a different Global instance 
>>> than the one that created them.
>>
>