RFR 8057742: ant clean test should not fail if one or more external test suites are missing

[A. Sundararajan]

Actually Hannes explained (offline) me why there are two copies of 
JDK-8048079 - basically to exercise code cache.
Updated webrev to make sure we do the same (i.e., exercise code cache) 
with the changed tests as well.

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8057742/webrev.02/

-Sundar

On Monday 08 September 2014 01:37 PM, A. Sundararajan wrote:
> Please review updated webrev @ 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8057742/webrev.01
>
> Only additional change from earlier webrev: TestFinder has added 
> warning for skipped tests due to missing external test suites. These 
> warnings appear upfront in test runs (if any / all external tests are 
> missing)
>
> -Sundar
>
> On Sunday 07 September 2014 04:20 PM, Marcus Lagergren wrote:
>> I’m not particularly against that- that be fine - a little reminder 
>> to run ‘ant externals’ to get full test coverage. But it still has to 
>> say zero failures after the run (albeit having run fewer tests than 
>> with externals). Otherwise it scares people.
>>
>> /M
>>
>> On 07 Sep 2014, at 10:59, Attila Szegedi <attila.szegedi at oracle.com> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I actually appreciated that I had a signal that some tests were not 
>>> run. If I do a fresh checkout and not run "ant externals", now I 
>>> won't get a signal that some tests weren't run, and maybe I'll 
>>> mistakenly think everything passed. How about at least an <echo> in 
>>> build.xml that'll print a warning after a successful test run that 
>>> some tests were skipped as externals aren't available?
>>>
>>> Attila.
>>>
>>> On Sep 7, 2014, at 7:04 AM, Marcus Lagergren 
>>> <marcus.lagergren at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Why did you remove some of the test runs? Just redundancy?
>>>>
>>>> Otherwise, looks fine form me. +1
>>>>
>>>> In the future I think it could be nice to have a proxy check before 
>>>> ant externals, which certainly helps me when I am behind a firewall.
>>>>
>>>> /M
>>>>
>>>> On 07 Sep 2014, at 06:40, A. Sundararajan 
>>>> <sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Please review http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8057742/
>>>>>
>>>>> Tested that w/without the test/script/external directory, "ant 
>>>>> clean test" is fine.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> -Sundar
>