Please review JDK-8059321

[Marcus Lagergren]

OK. New webrev here http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lagergren/8059321.2/webrev/

I experimented a bit with synchronization methods, and this seems to be the one that gives the least overhead - there is actually very little difference and 95% of the original performance increase is preserved.

(I also experimented with your ‘one extra recompile’ in CompiledFunction, and applied that diff - this brings us down another ~600 ms, which is nice indeed).

Let me know if this is semantically sound. From reading the OpenJDK code, I think it is.

/M


On 29 Sep 2014, at 11:22, Aleksey Shipilev <aleksey.shipilev at oracle.com> wrote:

> Yes, that's a simple adapter:
> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/Collections.html#newSetFromMap(java.util.Map)
> 
> See the example there.
> 
> -Aleksey.
> 
> On 09/29/2014 10:10 PM, Marcus Lagergren wrote:
>> Aleksey - I still need the weak semantics, because I don’t want to hold on to the strings. Would that work for the WeakHashMap and preserve semantics? #iamnotajavaprogrammer.
>> 
>>> 
>>> The entire shenanigan would go away if you turn the Map into Set with
>>> Collections.newSetFromMap(...), and then do add().
>>> 
>>> -Aleksey.
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
>