- [Approval Request] Review request for JDK-8071991

[Marcus Lagergren]

OK +1 to this as well. Equally trivial.

/M

> On 30 Jan 2015, at 12:25, Attila Szegedi <attila.szegedi at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the approval. I have identified yet another change that needs to be made, though; a test for as backported for JDK-8066232 was incomplete (it was incomplete in 9 too - I investigated the history of it in 9 and saw that it was just fixed later in a 9-only changeset). A new webrev is at <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~attila/8071991/webrev.01> with a trivial addition to test/script/basic/JDK-8066232.js. I also updated the bug to reflect it's now a more general "fix all build/test issues introduced by the last two Nashorn backports".
> 
> I can confirm that with these two changes all tests pass, so this should be the final word on this.
> 
> Attila.
> 
> On Jan 30, 2015, at 12:07 PM, Seán Coffey <sean.coffey at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
>> Looks fine. Thanks for jumping on this. Approved for jdk8u-dev. Please add noreg-build and 9-na labels.
>> 
>> regards,
>> Sean.
>> 
>> On 30/01/2015 11:05, Hannes Wallnoefer wrote:
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Am 2015-01-30 um 12:00 schrieb Attila Szegedi:
>>>> Please review JDK-8071991 at <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~attila/8071991/webrev.00> for <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8071991>
>>>> 
>>>> Unfortunately, backporting JDK-8067139 bit-by-bit managed to introduce a compile error as 8u-dev Nashorn diverges from 9 Nashorn in Parser.java. I failed to notice and fix that in time, so I expect 8u-dev build now breaks. Fixing post haste. I will suggest we backport the parser changes too so this can't cause issues in the future.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks and apologies,
>>>>  Attila.
>>> 
>> 
>