Review request for JDK-8139761: Improve Dynalink class nomenclature and package organization

[Hannes Wallnoefer]

Adding the linker.support package is probably the correct thing to do. 
But it creates two similiarly named packages and a  deeper and bigger 
package structure. My approach would  have been to keep the package 
structure simple, but if most people agree it's better this way I won't 
stand in the way.

Hannes

Am 2015-10-16 um 16:04 schrieb Attila Szegedi:
> Please review JDK-8139761 "Improve Dynalink class nomenclature and package organization" at <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~attila/8139761/webrev.jdk9> for <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8139761>
>
> Thanks,
>    Attila.