Review request for JDK-8135251: Use Unsafe.defineAnonymousClass for loading Nashorn script code

[Attila Szegedi]

Nope. Just compiled it with 9-b81 and no such warnings are present.

> On Sep 14, 2015, at 9:55 AM, Marcus Lagergren <lagergren at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> ant test
> 
> Does it spit out warnings like e.g.
> 
> Temp.java:1: warning: Unsafe is internal proprietary API and may be removed in a future release
> import sun.misc.Unsafe;
>                ^
> Temp.java:6: warning: Unsafe is internal proprietary API and may be removed in a future release
>     private static Unsafe getUnsafe() {
>                    ^
> Temp.java:7: warning: Unsafe is internal proprietary API and may be removed in a future release
> 	return AccessController.doPrivileged(new PrivilegedAction<Unsafe>() {
> 	                                                          ^
> Temp.java:9: warning: Unsafe is internal proprietary API and may be removed in a future release
>                     public Unsafe run() {
>                            ^
> Temp.java:11: warning: Unsafe is internal proprietary API and may be removed in a future release
> 			final Field theUnsafeField = Unsafe.class.getDeclaredField("theUnsafe");
> 			                             ^
> Temp.java:13: warning: Unsafe is internal proprietary API and may be removed in a future release
> 			return (Unsafe)theUnsafeField.get(null);
> 			        ^
> Temp.java:21: warning: Unsafe is internal proprietary API and may be removed in a future release
>     private static Unsafe UNSAFE = getUnsafe();
>                    ^
> 7 warnings
> 
> Because we don’t want compile warnings ;-)
> 
> /M
> 
> 
>> On 14 Sep 2015, at 09:54, Attila Szegedi <attila.szegedi at oracle.com <mailto:attila.szegedi at oracle.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> What do you mean by “unsafe warning”?
>> 
>>> On Sep 13, 2015, at 12:47 PM, Marcus Lagergren <lagergren at gmail.com <mailto:lagergren at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> +1. Nicely done.
>>> 
>>> Does this compile without unsafe warnings, though?
>>> 
>>> /M
>>> 
>>>> On 11 Sep 2015, at 18:00, Attila Szegedi <attila.szegedi at oracle.com <mailto:attila.szegedi at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> e
>>> 
>> 
>