Review request for JDK-8136700: Make sure Context.anonymousHostClasses doesn't grow unbounded
Sundararajan Athijegannathan
sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com
Fri Sep 18 13:59:02 UTC 2015
I presume it is for code clarity sake? That is a private method in that
class called only from the other synchronized method. How about just
adding an assert using Thread.holdsLock?
-Sundar
On 9/18/2015 7:14 PM, Hannes Wallnoefer wrote:
> Shouldn't the methods modifying the map also be synchronized, even if
> we know they are (currently) only called from a synchronized method?
>
> Otherwise looks good.
>
> Hannes
>
> Am 2015-09-18 um 14:05 schrieb Sundararajan Athijegannathan:
>> +1
>>
>> On 9/18/2015 3:24 PM, Attila Szegedi wrote:
>>>> On Sep 18, 2015, at 6:22 AM, Sundararajan Athijegannathan
>>>> <sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> * Context.compile is synchronized and so there is no need for
>>>> ConcurrentHashMap + concurrency related comment.
>>> You’re right, I removed them. I updated webrev in-place.
>>>
>>>> * Map.remove(Object, Object) is used which is since jdk 1.8. If we
>>>> have to backport this change to jdk8u (where jdk7 is used as
>>>> JAVA_HOME to build/test), we've to take care of this.
>>> If we backport, this will show up as a compile error, so we’ll
>>> adjust then. I’d rather run another round of a short review then
>>> than have a less efficient construct in 9 codebase.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Attila.
>>>
>>>> -Sundar
>>>>
>>>> On 9/17/2015 9:07 PM, Attila Szegedi wrote:
>>>>> Indeed, that’s correct. A new webrev is available for review at
>>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~attila/8136700/webrev.01.jdk9> that
>>>>> manually handles removal of cleared entries.
>>>>>
>>>>> Attila.
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sep 17, 2015, at 4:29 PM, Michael Haupt
>>>>>> <michael.haupt at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi again,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> no sorry; I have to revoke this as I forgot weak sets aren't weak
>>>>>> in the way they have to be in this case.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Michael
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 17.09.2015 um 16:18 schrieb Michael Haupt
>>>>>>> <michael.haupt at oracle.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Attila,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> lower-case thumbs up!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Michael
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 17.09.2015 um 16:14 schrieb Attila Szegedi
>>>>>>>> <attila.szegedi at oracle.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please review JDK-8136700 "Make sure
>>>>>>>> Context.anonymousHostClasses doesn't grow unbounded" at
>>>>>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~attila/8136700/webrev.jdk9> for
>>>>>>>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8136700>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Attila.
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <http://www.oracle.com/>
>>>>>> Dr. Michael Haupt | Principal Member of Technical Staff
>>>>>> Phone: +49 331 200 7277 | Fax: +49 331 200 7561
>>>>>> Oracle Java Platform Group | LangTools Team | Nashorn
>>>>>> Oracle Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG, Schiffbauergasse 14 | 14467
>>>>>> Potsdam, Germany
>>>>>> <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to
>>>>>> developing practices and products that help protect the environment
>>>>>>
>>
>
More information about the nashorn-dev
mailing list