Review request for JDK-8168005: Introduce namespaces for GET, SET Dynalink operations

[Attila Szegedi]

Hi Andreas,

you’re of course right about NamedOperation finality, that’s an oversight on my part. Also thanks for catching the documentation error. I’ll fix both.

Thanks,
  Attila.

> On 26 Oct 2016, at 18:30, Andreas Woess <andreas.woess at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Not a review, but one remark: it does not make sense that NamedOperation
> is a final class given the protected changeNameInternal method.
> Also, in the javadoc of this class: "The contract for these operation is"
> 
> Regards,
> Andreas
> 
> On 2016-10-26 12:48, Attila Szegedi wrote:
>> Please review JDK-8168005 "Introduce namespaces for GET, SET Dynalink operations" at <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~attila/8168005/webrev.jdk9> for <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8168005>
>> 
>> The JIRA issue has detailed rationale for the change. The diff is moderately large, but the Dynalink API changes are only a part of it, the rest is adjusting Nashorn, code examples, and tests to the changed API.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>>  Attila.
>> 
>