SocketPermission's implies() interesting behavior

[Michael McMahon]

Looks fine,

- Michael.

On 18/07/11 13:25, Chris Hegarty wrote:
> Michael,
>
> Can you please review this change. It has already been discussed and 
> agreed, I just rebased it against jdk8 and added a test.
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/7021280/webrev.02/webrev/
>
> Thanks,
> -Chris.
>
> On 07/13/11 04:07 AM, Charles Lee wrote:
>> On 07/12/2011 07:03 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/ 5/11 10:10 AM, Charles Lee wrote:
>>>> On 04/08/2011 04:47 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>>>>> On 04/ 7/11 04:53 PM, Neil Richards wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 10:43 +0000, Neil Richards wrote:
>>>>>>> On 11 March 2011 14:39, Chris Hegarty<chris.hegarty at oracle.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> As Michael (cc'ed) mentioned in an earlier mail, he is going to be
>>>>>>>> making
>>>>>>>> some significant changes in this area in the next week or two. He
>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>> include this change with the other one, so their impact can be
>>>>>>>> considered
>>>>>>>> together, if that is ok?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's fine by me, so long as the changeset that addresses this
>>>>>>> problem is linked back to this conversation (so that one can track
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> progress of the fix for this problem into the component, then 
>>>>>>> master
>>>>>>> repository).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you tell me if the changes headlined above have yet been made
>>>>>> to the
>>>>>> code (and point me to the URL of the change) ?
>>>>>
>>>>> These changes have not yet been integrated. I believe Michael will be
>>>>> pushing them soon.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Chris.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Neil
>>>>>>
>>>> Hi Chris,
>>>>
>>>> I have tested this issue with latest openjdk7 build (b147). The
>>>> "blabla"[1] test case still fails. Is it ok if I am going to give a
>>>> patch according the openjdk 8 code base?
>>>
>>> I apologize for this. By the time the other changes were ready for
>>> SocketPermission we were past the lock down period for JDK7. I'll
>>> proceed with getting the changes we agreed upon [1] into JDK8.
>>>
>>> -Chris.
>>>
>>> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/7021280/webrev.01/webrev/
>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7021280
>>>>
>> No problem. Thank you very much, Chris.
>>