Question about getaddrinfo in Inet4AddressImpl.c

Chris Hegarty chris.hegarty at oracle.com
Tue Nov 8 11:25:59 PST 2011


Charles,

Is it possible to fix up the style issues, etc that Neil pointed out, 
and have the webrev updated?

Thanks,
-Chris.

On 11/ 8/11 01:44 PM, Charles Lee wrote:
> On 11/03/2011 12:33 AM, Neil Richards wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 23:07 +0800, Charles Lee wrote:
>>> On 10/26/2011 06:31 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>>>> On 26/10/2011 10:36, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>>>> On 26/10/2011 10:24, Charles Lee wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> />>> I don't think this code has changed too much since then and
>>>>>> probably could do with a clean-up./
>>>>>> Not true.
>>>>> I'm talking about the InetAddress* code, that hasn't changed
>>>>> significantly and probably could do with some modernization now.
>>>> Yes, please submit a patch for this cleanup and we'll review it.
>>>>
>>>> -Chris.
>>>>
>>>>> -Alan.
>>> Hi Chris, Alan and Neil,
>>>
>>> Here is the rest of the patch (attached). The patch is a little big
>>> because some formats.
>>>
>> For ease of review, I've uploaded this change (ie. the combination of
>> Charles' 'patch.contr.v1' and 'patch.contr.part2') as a webrev [1].
>>
>> My initial (and picky) observation is that the code indentation needs a
>> little work to comply with the OpenJDK coding conventions [2].
>> (Particularly using a standard indentation for 4 spaces).
>>
>> Regards, Neil
>>
>> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ngmr/ojdk-229/webrev.00/
>> [2] http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/codeconventions-150003.pdf
>>
> Hi guys,
>
> Apart from the code convention issues, would anyone help to review the
> patch? It's kind of big patch :-)
>



More information about the net-dev mailing list