Review problemlist.txt

[Chris Hegarty]

On 19/10/2011 16:49, Kurchi Subhra Hazra wrote:
> That is fine with me. Can I remove the test as a part of fixing 7102704?

Sounds good to me.

The problem is that we can't be sure what local address will be returned 
on a dual stack system, other than one of the local addresses. Which 
doesn't seem worth testing.

-Chris.

>
> Thanks,
> Kurchi
>
> On 10/19/11 8:48 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>> Michael, Kurchi,
>>
>> java/net/DatagramSocket/ChangingAddress.java was added recently in
>> JDK8, see CR 7084030. Looking at it again I'm not sure if the test
>> makes sense, or at least we would have to loosen its restrictions so
>> much that it wouldn't be testing anything useful ( or the crooks of
>> the original change it was added for).
>>
>> We have a very similar test in nio,
>> java/nio/channels/DatagramChannel/ChangingAddress.java, which already
>> covers similar functionality.
>>
>> How about we just remove it?
>>
>> -Chris.
>>
>> On 19/10/2011 15:45, Michael McMahon wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We have a few test failures on the nightly test run.
>>> So, I'd like to move them on to the problem list pending
>>> investigation.
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/7102665/webrev.1/
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Michael
>