Code Review Request: 7158636: InterfaceAddress.getBroadcast() returns invalid broadcast address on WLAN
Chris Hegarty
chris.hegarty at oracle.com
Wed Apr 18 06:00:00 PDT 2012
Thanks Kurchi, I think this change should be fine.
-Chris.
On 17/04/2012 22:34, Kurchi Hazra wrote:
> Updated webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~khazra/7158636/webrev.01/
>
> Windows has a more secure version of snprintf and I used that:
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/f30dzcf6%28v=vs.110%29.aspx
>
> Thanks,
> Kurchi
>
>
> On 4/17/2012 12:24 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>> On 17/04/12 20:14, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>> On 17/04/2012 19:47, Kurchi Hazra wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> In Windows Vista and later, InterfaceAddress.getBroadcast() returns
>>>> 0.0.0.0 , since these platforms return IF_TYPE_IEEE80211 instead of
>>>> MIB_IF_TYPE_ETHERNET for wireless interface type now. The fix is to
>>>> handle IF_TYPE_IEEE80211 in the relevant switch
>>>> statement. While doing this, I also updated some other parts of the
>>>> code in the same file that depended on the value of the wireless
>>>> interface type.
>>>>
>>>> Although I have defined IF_TYPE_IEEE80211 in NetworkInterface.c, I am
>>>> not sure if it is better to put it in NetworkInterface.h instead.
>>>>
>>>> Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7158636
>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~khazra/7158636/webrev.00/
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Kurchi
>>>>
>>> Looks okay to me although I would like to see this code changed to
>>> snprintf.
>>
>> D'oh, good catch.
>>
>> -Chris.
>>
>>>
>>> I don't have a strong opinion on where IF_TYPE_IEEE80211 is defined.
>>>
>>> -Alan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
More information about the net-dev
mailing list