RFR JDK-4880778
Chris Hegarty
chris.hegarty at oracle.com
Mon Feb 4 01:40:36 PST 2013
On 02/02/2013 16:29, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 02/02/2013 14:39, John Zavgren wrote:
>> Greetings:
>>
>> Please consider the following modification of our classes for handling
>> URLs.
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jzavgren/4880778/webrev.01/
>>
>>
> This looks okay to me.
Yes, looks ok to me too.
> For the URLStreamHandler setURL methods then an alternative to removing
> the statement would be just adjust the wording, say replace "be able to
> call the set method on a URL" to "be able to use this method to set the
> values of the URL fields".
I think Alan's wording is probably best here.
There a subtlety I missed the first time I read the proposed wording,
'this method'. Overriding setURL in a concrete URLStreamHandler will
never be able to set the fields of a URL. So the wording is technically
correct.
> Minor nit, but there are couple of alignment issues. In URL then the
> arguments spill onto 2 or 3 lines so they can be re-aligned. In
> URLStreamHandler it look slike the setURL method isn't quite lined up
> with the other methods (pre-dates your proposed changes).
Agreed.
-Chris.
>
> -Alan.
More information about the net-dev
mailing list