RFR JDK7188517
Chris Hegarty
chris.hegarty at oracle.com
Tue May 7 06:43:45 PDT 2013
On 05/06/2013 10:28 PM, Kurchi Hazra wrote:
> This looks okay to me.
Source changes look fine to me too. Probably best to add a test for '$'
In fact, Michael actually removed such a test [1] during another change.
We should get positive agreement from Michael before pushing this.
-Chris.
[1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/7bd32bfc0539
>
> - Kurchi
>
>
> On 5/2/2013 10:09 AM, John Zavgren wrote:
>> All:
>> My original email was mangled by my email program (stbeehive/zimbra)
>> ... so I'm sending a second correctly formatted copy.
>>
>> I'm sorry for the inconvenience.
>>
>> John
>> ---------------
>>
>> Please consider the following change to the cookie constructor:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jzavgren/7188517/webrev.01/
>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ejzavgren/7188517/webrev.01/>
>>
>> Basically there are two issues:
>>
>> 1.) the existing cookie constructor was allowing cookie names to have
>> a dollar sign as their leading character,
>> which is "illegal". The constructor code was modified to disallow
>> these illegal names.
>>
>> 2.) the API document (notice the specdiff:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jzavgren/7188517/specDiff/
>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ejzavgren/7188517/specDiff/>) prohibited
>> the use of cookie names that are one of the tokens reserved for use by
>> the cookie protocol, and this restriction is not necessary.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> John Zavgren
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: john.zavgren at oracle.com
>> To: net-dev at openjdk.java.net
>> Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2013 10:36:38 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
>> Subject: RFR JDK7188517
>>
>> Greetings: Please consider the following change to the cookie
>> constructor: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jzavgren/7188517/webrev.01/
>> Basically there are two issues: 1.) the existing cookie constructor
>> was allowing cookie names to have a dollar sign as their leading
>> character, which is "illegal". The constructor code was modified to
>> disallow these illegal names. 2.) the API document (notice the
>> specdiff: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jzavgren/7188517/specDiff/)
>> prohibited the use of cookie names that are one of the tokens reserved
>> for use by the cookie protocol, and this restriction is not necessary.
>> Thanks! John Zavgren
>
> --
> -Kurchi
>
More information about the net-dev
mailing list