RFR: 8027570 NullPointerException in URLPermission.hashCode()
Michael McMahon
michael.x.mcmahon at oracle.com
Wed Oct 30 11:01:29 PDT 2013
Thanks Chris. I'll add the bug number
Michael
On 30/10/13 17:52, Chris Hegarty wrote:
> Looks good to me Michael.
>
> Trivially, the test could include this bug number in its @bug tag.
>
> -Chris
>
>> On 30 Oct 2013, at 16:51, Michael McMahon <michael.x.mcmahon at oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>> Interesting little bug this one. The precedence rules
>> were overlooked and the expected result of an expression evaluation
>> wasn't what was expected. The webrev is below, but the diff is
>>
>> diff -r 9a5048dc7c0d src/share/classes/java/net/URLPermission.java
>> --- a/src/share/classes/java/net/URLPermission.java Wed Oct 30 14:41:42 2013 +0000
>> +++ b/src/share/classes/java/net/URLPermission.java Wed Oct 30 16:33:15 2013 +0000
>> @@ -353,7 +353,7 @@
>> return getActions().hashCode()
>> + scheme.hashCode()
>> + authority.hashCode()
>> - + path == null ? 0 : path.hashCode();
>> + + (path == null ? 0 : path.hashCode());
>> }
>>
>>
>> Without the parentheses:
>>
>> scheme.hashCode() + authority.hashCode() + path
>>
>> is evaluated as a string concatenation. The result is compared with null, which always fails,
>> meaning that path.hashCode() is always called, even when path is null ....
>>
>> webrev is at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/8027570/webrev.1/
>>
>> Thanks
>> Michael
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
More information about the net-dev
mailing list