RFR [9] 8039470:URLConnection.getContent incorrectly specifies the default location of content handler classes

[Michael McMahon]

Looks fine to me Chris.

- Michael

On 09/04/14 18:21, Chris Hegarty wrote:
> Michael, Alan
>
> There is/was an additional reference to the implementation specific 
> package name in ContentHandler. It is now removed. I think this is the 
> last one!
>
> Latest specdiff:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8039470/02/java/net/package-summary.html 
>
>
> On 09/04/14 14:33, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> On 09/04/2014 14:13, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>>> Flip-flop!
>>>
>>> Thinking again about this, you're right.
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8039470/URLConnection-report.html
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8039470/URLConnection-report_01.html
>>>
>>> I could go further with this change, but I just want to remove the
>>> reference to the sun.* package, that should not be in the public API.
>>>
>> Would it make sense to just remove the bulk of step 2 from the javadoc
>> and just specify that it uses a built-in implementation default if is
>> exists for the content type?
>
> Step 2 is important for user defined handlers, but it may not be 
> correctly placed. I moved it to ContentHandler
>
> -Chris.
>
>>
>> -Alan