RFR(S): 8055032: Improve numerical parsing in java.net and sun.net

[Alan Bateman]

On 14/08/2014 14:23, Claes Redestad wrote:
> How about methods only taking beginIndex? Integer.parseInt("x: 
> 10000000", 3, 10)? I guess these could to be dropped
> to avoid ambiguity and instead allow for variations where radix can be 
> left out.
>
> I think there are two alternatives to the current implementation:
> - only keep parseInt(CharSequence s, int beginIndex, int endIndex, int 
> radix)
That's my preference, and core-libs-dev would be the place to move the 
discussion.

-Alan.


> - optional radix: parseInt(CharSequence s, int beginIndex, int 
> endIndex), parseInt(CharSequence s, int beginIndex, int endIndex, int 
> radix)
>
> (Should this discussion be moved to core-libs-dev?)
>
> /Claes