RFR for JDK-8031666: TEST_BUG: java/net/ipv6tests/UdpTest.java failed because of SocketTimeoutException
Tristan Yan
tristan.yan at oracle.com
Fri Jan 17 02:39:58 PST 2014
Agree, reset timeout should be better move
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tyan/JDK-8031666/webrev.01/
Thank you
Tristan
On 01/17/2014 06:32 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
> The bug shows the following stacktrace:
>
> ----------System.err:(16/903)----------
> java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Receive timed out
> at
> java.net.DualStackPlainDatagramSocketImpl.socketReceiveOrPeekData(Native
> Method)
> at
> java.net.DualStackPlainDatagramSocketImpl.peekData(DualStackPlainDatagramSocketImpl.java:109)
> at java.net.DatagramSocket.receive(DatagramSocket.java:721)
> at UdpTest.test2(UdpTest.java:159)
> at UdpTest.main(UdpTest.java:72)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:483)
> at
> com.sun.javatest.regtest.MainAction$SameVMRunnable.run(MainAction.java:746)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)
> ----
>
> So the failure was not related to the initial two receives that are
> expected to timeout. 4000 millis should be sufficient for these.
>
> The failure looks like it is because the third receive, that is
> expected to NOT timeout, does timeout. The socket timeout value is
> still set, in the original code, to 4000 millis. It should be more
> efficient to simply increase the timeout of the socket just before the
> third received, to say 10000 millis.
>
> Make sense?
>
> -Chris.
>
>
> On 17/01/14 05:40, Tristan Yan wrote:
>> Hi All
>>
>> Please review the simple code fix for JDK-8031666.
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tyan/JDK-8031666/webrev.00/
>>
>> This test fails in very small chance. Adding socket timeout a little
>> bigger.
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>> Tristan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/attachments/20140117/9c7b0e57/attachment.html
More information about the net-dev
mailing list