RFR [9] 8143554: UnsupportedOperationException is not thrown for unsupported options

[Alan Bateman]

I'm sure Michael will look at this but I have a question - shouldn't 
SocketImpl throw UOE for this case? I'm just wondering if checking the 
supported options in setOption/getOption is just covering up an issue 
with the SocketImpl methods.

-Alan


On 08/12/2015 12:36, Svetlana Nikandrova wrote:
> Little reminder.
>
> On 03.12.2015 16:06, Svetlana Nikandrova wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> please review a simple fix for:
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8143554
>>
>> See webrev here:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kshefov/8143554/webrev.00/ 
>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ekshefov/8143554/webrev.00/>
>>
>> Fix added explicit check for option support to getOption and 
>> setOption sockets' methods similar way as it was done prior jdk 9 in 
>> Sockets class.
>> Fix also exposed another problem with sockets' supported options: 
>> JDK-8143923 <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8143923> that 
>> cause new test failure test/java/net/SocketOption/OptionsTest.java. I 
>> added test to the ProblemList.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Svetlana
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/attachments/20151208/498e5416/attachment.html>