RFR 4906983: java.net.URL constructors throw MalformedURLException in undocumented way
Sebastian Sickelmann
sebastian.sickelmann at gmx.de
Tue Dec 15 16:41:36 UTC 2015
Thanks for the review.
David, would you like to support me by the pushing part.
I have create a proper formated changeset here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sebastian/4906983/webrev.00/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sebastian/4906983/webrev.00/jdk.changeset
--
Sebastian
On 12/15/2015 04:20 PM, Mark Sheppard wrote:
> yes that's fine with me also
>
> regards
> Mark
>
> On 15/12/2015 15:04, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>> On 13 Nov 2015, at 04:59, Sebastian Sickelmann
>> <sebastian.sickelmann at gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> my recordings related to this thread show me that this thread is
>>> open. Sorry for loosing track for some time.
>>>
>>> If i am right i got an thumbs up review result from Chris Hegarty
>>> for an older patch http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dbuck/4906983.1/
>>> (pending the outcome of the mail-exchange with Mark-Sheppard).
>>> @Chris: Am i right in my assumption? Is this still valid?
>>>
>>> The result on the pending mail-exchange is in the
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dbuck/4906983.3/
>> I’m ok with this latest version.
>>
>> -Chris.
>>
>>
>>> @Mark: Are you ok, with the provided patch?
>>>
>>> @David: Thanks for hosting the webrevs for me and suggesting that i
>>> try to become an author of OpenJDK.
>>>
>>> As I am now an author, i would like to create a jdk-changeset
>>> (depending on a positive review result) and host it on my
>>> cr.openjdk.java.net account.
>>> I would list Chris and Mark as reviewers.
>>>
>>> @David: Are you still ok with supporting me to push this changeset
>>> depending on a positive review result? Are you ok to be mentioned as
>>> reviewer too? I haven't found any review statement from your site.
>>> Thanks again for your great support getting me up and running with
>>> the openjdk infrastructure.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Sebastian
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/16/2015 04:27 PM, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> here is the updated webrev:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dbuck/4906983.3/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hope the comments are fine now.
>>>>
>>>> What would be the normal procedure in net-dev for accepting a
>>>> change (a
>>>> 2 group-member thumbs-up like in core-libs)?
>>>>
>>>> -- Sebastian
>>>>
>>>> .........cleared long thread............... please see
>>>> mailing-list-archive for details
>>>>
>>>>
>
More information about the net-dev
mailing list