RFR: 5108778 Too many instances of java.lang.Boolean created in Java application(net)

Sebastian Sickelmann sebastian.sickelmann at gmx.de
Sat Nov 7 09:02:30 UTC 2015


Hi Brad,

The bug is for the complete codebase, where the webrev is for the
net-dev part only. I have already created
a subtask for the macos-port-dev part, and it is fixed already.

Now I would create a net-dev part sub-task as well.
For the net-dev part of this JBS-Ticket, it is javadoc only. But for the
rest (jaxp, corba, etc.) it is a little bit more.
Do you want to update your comment in JBS, to limit your analysis to the
net-dev part?

What do you mean by "Did you make the javadocs target to test?".
Do you think it is worth to write/update tests for the new suggestion
from the javadoc?

-- Sebastian

On 11/06/2015 11:00 PM, Bradford Wetmore wrote:
>
> This bug talks about not only javadoc, but the actual code as well. It
> looks like someone has already hit all of that, so this is the only
> thing left.
>
> What you've proposed looks ok.  Did you make the javadocs target to test?
>

> Brad
>
>
>
> On 11/5/2015 7:42 PM, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote:
>> Hi, i wanted to start an discussion/review-process some time ago, see
>> second-try below.
>>
>> Is there someone who wants to discuss/review this javadoc-only change?
>>
>> Else, should i link my result as reference into the JBS?
>>
>> -- Sebastian
>>
>> On 10/27/2015 05:28 AM, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Actually I am searching through the JBS for low hanging fruits.
>>> Right now i am looking through the openjdk-sources and try to evaluate
>>> if i can make something about JDK-5108778.
>>>
>>> Please find my webrevs for the jdk(net) repos at:
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sebastian/5108778/net/webrev.00/
>>>
>>> The changes are javadoc only.
>>>
>>> -- Sebastian
>>>
>>>
>>



More information about the net-dev mailing list