RFR 4906983: java.net.URL constructors throw MalformedURLException in undocumented way

[Mark Sheppard]

I was thinking as a change for all constructors, as there are URL, which 
may overload authority part's structural elements such that port might be
a "remote object id",  or some other form of token.

OK, that's fine

On 13/09/2015 15:25, Chris Hegarty wrote:
> Is this suggested wording for the “spec” accepting constructors?  I 
> think what we have for the constructors accepting protocol, host, 
> port, etc, is more accurate.