JEP 110 - Violating Naming Convention ?
Bernd Eckenfels
ecki at zusammenkunft.net
Wed Aug 17 23:20:43 UTC 2016
Hello
I think .get() or .put() would look even strange. With all uppercase
it is rather clear its an HTTP/2 method keyword.
Gruss
Bernd
Am Wed, 17 Aug 2016
16:51:18 +0300 schrieb Rahman USTA <rahman.usta.88 at gmail.com>:
> Thank you Pavel, this uncommon usage looks to me very weird.
>
> I hope it could be re-evaluated again.
>
> Thanks
>
> 2016-08-17 16:29 GMT+03:00 Pavel Rappo <pavel.rappo at oracle.com>:
>
> > The correct mailing list for issues in java.net area would be
> > net-dev at openjdk.java.net
> >
> > IMO, these conventions are just guidelines. One can override them
> > in some circumstances where it makes a lot of sense. Yes, the
> > barrier for violations
> > should be high. I believe this is one of the cases.
> >
> > > On 17 Aug 2016, at 14:12, Rahman USTA <rahman.usta.88 at gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello;
> > >
> > > I'm trying the new HTTP/2 Client API. For example I have a sample
> > > code below;
> > >
> > > HttpResponse response = HttpRequest
> > > .create(URI.create("https://istanbul-jug.org"))
> > > .GET()
> > > .response();
> > >
> > > System.out.println(response.body(HttpResponse.asString()));
> > >
> > > It works excepted, however I see that the method name GET is
> > > written
> > fully
> > > uppercase. I have never seen this usage yet anywhere in Java. Is
> > > that a right usage in Java?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Rahman USTA
> > > Istanbul JUG
> > > https://github.com/rahmanusta <http://www.kodcu.com/>
> >
> >
>
>
More information about the net-dev
mailing list