RFR 8114860: Behavior of java.net.URLPermission.getActions() contradicts spec

Vyom Tewari vyom.tewari at oracle.com
Mon Jun 20 13:51:49 UTC 2016


Hi,

Please find the updated 
webrev(http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vtewari/8114860/webrev0.1/index.html 
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Evtewari/8114860/webrev0.1/index.html>). I 
incorporated the review comments and remove the "HashCodeTest" where it 
compares the hashcode with hard coded hashcode.

Thanks,
Vyom


On Monday 20 June 2016 03:57 PM, Pavel Rappo wrote:
> Hi Vyom, thanks for looking into this!
>
> 0.  * Copyright (c) 2013,2016 Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
>
> If I understand correctly, we're not required to update years in the header
> manually. But if you decided to do so, please follow the established pattern (in
> both files you've changed):
>
>      * Copyright (c) 2013, 2016, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
>                           ^    ^
>
> 1. I wonder if we could use String convenience methods instead of bringing
> dependency on java.util.stream.Collector. Could something like this be a bit
> better both in terms of dependencies and readability?
>
>      private String actions() {
>          String b = String.join(",", methods);
>          if (!requestHeaders.isEmpty()) {
>              b = ":" + String.join(",", requestHeaders);
>          }
>          return b;
>      }
>
> 2. Is there a particular reason for these parentheses?
>
>      150             return (expectedActions.equals(urlp.getActions()));
>                             ^                                         ^
>
> 3. Why are these lines commented out?
>
>      259     static Test[] hashTests = {
>      260         //hashtest("http://www.foo.com/path", "GET:X-Foo", 388644203),
>      261         //hashtest("http:*", "*:*", 3255810)
>      262     };
>      
> IMO they either have to be updates or removed altogether.
>
> Thanks,
> -Pavel
>
>> On 20 Jun 2016, at 08:44, Vyom Tewari <vyom.tewari at oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>> ping!
>>
>> On Saturday 11 June 2016 10:34 AM, vyom wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Please review the below fix.
>>>
>>> Bug               : JDK-8114860 Behavior of java.net.URLPermission.getActions() contradicts spec
>>> Webrev         : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vtewari/8114860/webrev0.0/index.html <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Evtewari/8114860/webrev0.0/index.html>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Vyom



More information about the net-dev mailing list