RFR(XS): 8201369: Inet4AddressImpl_getLocalHostName reverse lookup on Solaris only

[vyom tewari]

looks good to me, As Christoph already mentioned just update the 
copyright date.

Vyom


On Monday 16 April 2018 02:14 PM, Srividya Shamaiah wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
> Please review the attached patch in
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mhorie/8201369/webrev/ 
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Emhorie/8201369/webrev/>
>
> Can you also backport this to JDK 8, we have customers waiting for 
> this fix at JDK 8 level.
>
> Thanks,
> Srividya S
>
> Inactive hide details for Srividya Shamaiah---11/04/2018 03:35:38 
> PM---Thanks Chris , As you suggested, I will provide the patcSrividya 
> Shamaiah---11/04/2018 03:35:38 PM---Thanks Chris , As you suggested, I 
> will provide the patch based on jdk 11. Thanks,
>
> From: Srividya Shamaiah/India/IBM
> To: "Langer, Christoph" <christoph.langer at sap.com>
> Cc: Chris Hegarty <chris.hegarty at oracle.com>, OpenJDK Network Dev list 
> <net-dev at openjdk.java.net>
> Date: 11/04/2018 03:35 PM
> Subject: RE: 8169865 : Changes not ported to IPv4
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Thanks Chris , As you suggested, I will provide the patch based on jdk 11.
>
> Thanks,
> Srividya S
>
>
> Inactive hide details for "Langer, Christoph" ---11/04/2018 02:51:51 
> PM---Hi Srividya, I would also welcome this fix."Langer, Christoph" 
> ---11/04/2018 02:51:51 PM---Hi Srividya, I would also welcome this fix.
>
> From: "Langer, Christoph" <christoph.langer at sap.com>
> To: Srividya Shamaiah <sshamaia at in.ibm.com>, Chris Hegarty 
> <chris.hegarty at oracle.com>
> Cc: OpenJDK Network Dev list <net-dev at openjdk.java.net>
> Date: 11/04/2018 02:51 PM
> Subject: RE: 8169865 : Changes not ported to IPv4
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hi Srividya,
>
> I would also welcome this fix.
>
> Will you do the fix based on the jdk (11) depot? I think 
> Java_java_net_Inet4AddressImpl_getLocalHostName should then be exactly 
> the same as Java_java_net_Inet6AddressImpl_getLocalHostName. I can 
> assist you with sponsoring/backporting to JDK8, if you like.
>
> Best regards
> Christoph
>
>
>
> *From:*net-dev [mailto:net-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net] *On Behalf Of 
> *Srividya Shamaiah*
> Sent:*Mittwoch, 11. April 2018 09:19*
> To:*Chris Hegarty <chris.hegarty at oracle.com>*
> Cc:*OpenJDK Network Dev list <net-dev at openjdk.java.net>*
> Subject:*Re: 8169865 : Changes not ported to IPv4
>
> Thank you Chris for opening the JIRA bug, I will work on the fix and 
> contribute it .
>
> Thanks,
> Srividya S
>
> Inactive hide details for Chris Hegarty ---10/04/2018 08:51:05 PM---> 
> On 10 Apr 2018, at 12:34, Srividya Shamaiah <sshamaia at in.Chris Hegarty 
> ---10/04/2018 08:51:05 PM---> On 10 Apr 2018, at 12:34, Srividya 
> Shamaiah <_sshamaia at in.ibm.com_ <mailto:sshamaia at in.ibm.com>> wrote: >
>
> From: Chris Hegarty <_chris.hegarty at oracle.com_ 
> <mailto:chris.hegarty at oracle.com>>
> To: Srividya Shamaiah <_sshamaia at in.ibm.com_ <mailto:sshamaia at in.ibm.com>>
> Cc: OpenJDK Network Dev list <_net-dev at openjdk.java.net_ 
> <mailto:net-dev at openjdk.java.net>>
> Date: 10/04/2018 08:51 PM
> Subject: Re: 8169865 : Changes not ported to IPv4
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 10 Apr 2018, at 12:34, Srividya Shamaiah <_sshamaia at in.ibm.com_ 
> <mailto:sshamaia at in.ibm.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > One of our customer reported a similar issue and the issue can be 
> resolved through the bug fix 8169865 which was include at 8u152 level. 
> We were looking this issue from AIX perspective as it did not do the 
> reverse lookup with bug fix 8169865 (as reverse lookup is limited to 
> solaris after the bug fix).
> >
> > While implementing the fix, we want to make sure the fix works for 
> all scenario. As there is an inconsistency between IPv6 and IPv4 after 
> 8169865 (as reverse lookup still exists for IPv4 on AIX and Linux), we 
> are afraid whether customer can hit the same issue if they use IPv4.
> >
> > Please confirm whether it makes sense to remove the reverse lookup 
> of IPv4 for AIX and linux platforms so that IPv4 and IPv6 processing 
> is consistent for those platforms.
>
> Yes, I believe it does.
>
> I filed the follow JIRA issue to track this:
> _https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.openjdk.java.net_browse_JDK-2D8201369&d=DwIFAg&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=cY5OjfQF2gZ_G00XrJYGrxPgLDHmXjFqs49sDD9oJN0&m=-LhngTQSiYD1d12WSDvX2Jldxusyok9A7LqJ4ZEIzos&s=8fDzPwCaD2hwIOSWkfchiRBeDz3uSyzk81kDXZFarXo&e=_
>
> -Chris.
>
>
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/attachments/20180416/859530c2/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: graycol.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 105 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/attachments/20180416/859530c2/graycol.gif>