Patch for JDK Bug 8173620

[can comert]

Hello Alan,

Thanks for your quick reply.

Yes, I have found it in a commit as a part of JDK-8220493 as you said.
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/b5a73f22b2bd#l3.134

I think this should fix the issue, thanks for your help.

Best Regards,
Can Cömert


Alan Bateman <Alan.Bateman at oracle.com>, 25 Mar 2019 Pzt, 16:59 tarihinde
şunu yazdı:

> On 25/03/2019 15:46, can comert wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I have created a commit for fixing the JDK Bug 8173620 which is
> > documented here:
> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173620
> >
> > Here is content for the commit for fixing the "Should not reach here"
> > error in case of the call to underlying Proxy implementation throws an
> > exception:
> >
> https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/openjdk-jdk8u/pull/4/commits/d6e6370baad78dfaf34003bb8642f1a5cc9fa064
> >
> > I have not created a Mercury patch for that but before going down on
> > that road,
> > I would like to ask what is the acceptability of this patch and is it
> > possible to apply this into next Bug fix version for Java 8?
> >
> > If it is possible and you can accept the change then I can create a
> > Mercury patch with same or similar content.
> >
> We can't review/accept patches that are not contributed via OpenJDK
> infrastructure.
>
> In any case, can you check jdk/jdk as I suspect this issue has already
> been fixed for JDK 13. Specifically, as part of JDK-8220493, the
> doTunnelling method was changed to handle any IOException thrown by the
> HTTP protocol handler.
>
> -Alan
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/attachments/20190325/f23c3645/attachment.html>