RFR[8241072]: 'Reimplement Legacy DatagramSocket API'

[Alan Bateman]

On 15/04/2020 20:22, Patrick Concannon wrote:
> :
>
> WRT the PDSI issue, I've created a bug to track this and have assigned 
> it to myself. You can view the issue here: 
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8242885
>
>
Thanks. That should be trivial to fix and should allow SendBufCheck to 
be updated to avoid testing that the older implementation has the wrong 
limit. The JEP hasn't been proposed to target yet so I think there is 
time to get this sorted out in advance.

Is SetGetSendBufferSize.java about extending test coverage? If so then I 
think the range of input needs to be expanded a bit, e.g. attempting to 
set to 0 should throw IAE, it should at least be possible to set it to 
64. I'm curious why the test checks getSoTimeout after the socket has 
been closed. Do you know if the test coverage for the receive buffer 
size is sufficient?

-Alan