RFR: 8274779: HttpURLConnection: HttpClient and HttpsClient incorrectly check request method when set to POST [v3]
Daniel Fuchs
dfuchs at openjdk.java.net
Fri Oct 15 15:28:50 UTC 2021
On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 14:47:18 GMT, Evan Whelan <ewhelan at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please review my fix for JDK-8274779 which changes how HttpClient and HttpsClient checks for equality when comparing request methods.
>>
>> When `HttpURLConnection.setRequestMethod` is passed `new String("POST")` rather than the "POST" String literal, the old behaviour resulted in broken HttpClients being reused from the `KeepAliveCache`.
>>
>> This is because a call to `HttpClient.available()` was never reachable due to identity equality being used instead of logical equality.
>>
>> The test case uses an injected KeepAliveCache, to which we put a HttpClient that is unavailable. By comparing the initial HttpClient's `connectTimeout` value to the "cached" client's connectTimeout (1234 vs 4321 respectively) we can assert that these values should never be equal as a new HttpClient should be created in cases where we can no longer use the cached one.
>>
>> All CI testing is green for this fix.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Evan
>
> Evan Whelan has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional commits since the last revision:
>
> - Extracted both connectTimeouts to variables and added copyright header to accessor
> - Removed reflection in favour of injected accessor for KeepAliveCache
test/jdk/sun/net/www/http/RequestMethodCheck/RequestMethodEquality.java line 96:
> 94: Field inCache = HttpClient.class.getDeclaredField("inCache");
> 95: inCache.setAccessible(true);
> 96: inCache.setBoolean(freshClient, true); // allows the assertion in HttpClient.New to pass
You can use the HttpClientAccess to get and set this field too, since the field is protected in HttpClient.
Just add a method:
public void setInCache(HttpClient client, boolean inCache) { client.inCache = inCache; }
to HttpClientAccess.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5964
More information about the net-dev
mailing list