RFR: 8308310: HttpClient: Avoid logging or locking from within synchronized blocks [v8]
Jaikiran Pai
jpai at openjdk.org
Wed May 24 10:37:59 UTC 2023
On Tue, 23 May 2023 15:11:10 GMT, Daniel Fuchs <dfuchs at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Please find here a change that revisits usage of monitors in the HttpClient.
>>
>> With Virtual Threads now part of the platform it should be possible to pass a newVirtualThreadPerTaskExecutor to the HttpClient. Logging, when enabled, and when called from a synchronized block, can cause the carrier thread to get pinned in case of contention when printing through the underlying PrintStream.
>>
>> This change aims at avoiding situations where the carrier threads might get pinned.
>
> Daniel Fuchs has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 11 commits:
>
> - Merge branch 'master' into HttpClient-Logging-8308310
> - Merge branch 'master' into HttpClient-Logging-8308310
> - Fix whitespace
> - make stateLock final
> - Add debug traces to ExpectContinueTest.java
> - failedRef should be final
> - Align parameters
> - Update src/java.net.http/share/classes/jdk/internal/net/http/Http1Response.java
>
> Co-authored-by: Andrey Turbanov <turbanoff at gmail.com>
> - Update src/java.net.http/share/classes/jdk/internal/net/http/ConnectionPool.java
>
> Co-authored-by: Andrey Turbanov <turbanoff at gmail.com>
> - Update test/jdk/java/net/httpclient/AuthFilterCacheTest.java
>
> Co-authored-by: Andrey Turbanov <turbanoff at gmail.com>
> - ... and 1 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/c0c4d771...c5d2f1f2
src/java.net.http/share/classes/jdk/internal/net/http/ConnectionPool.java line 476:
> 474: }
> 475:
> 476: // should only be called while holding the ConnectionPool stateLock.
Hello Daniel, all these methods which say a lock needs to be held when they are called, should we add a `assert stateLock.isHeldByCurrentThread();` to make it verifiable? I understand we didn't have a similar assert when the comment said the method needs to be called while holding the monitor, but since we are changing this part now, perhaps we can add those asserts?
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14038#discussion_r1203869893
More information about the net-dev
mailing list