OpenJDK (JDK 11) behavior discussion for HttpClient
Daniel Fuchs
daniel.fuchs at oracle.com
Fri Sep 15 12:50:30 UTC 2023
Hi Asha,
Thanks for the report. Do you see the same issue when using a
more recent version of the JDK (e.g.: 17)?
I'm not quite sure why your log show 3 prefaces. Are you sending
three requests? The ones starting with 95 looks strange.
It looks as if it start with the posted data - as Daniel Jelińsky
already suggested.
best regards
-- daniel
On 15/09/2023 10:26, Asha Sunagar wrote:
> Hello Team,
>
>
> We are facing invalid preface issue when we send POST request using
> HttpClient. We overcame this issue using workaround mentioned in openjdk
> issue <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8198947>. The workaround was
> to use a blank request before making post request.
>
> Based on our below observations, the Preface String is different in
> Failure & Success case,
>
>
> The Preface String for
> 1.1) Post Request without blank request --> we get GOAWAY Exception
> (Failure case)
>
> Preface String: [80, 82, 73, 32, 42, 32, 72, 84, 84, 80, 47, 50, 46, 48,
> 13, 10, 13, 10, 83, 77, 13, 10, 13, 10]
>
> Preface String: [95, 70, 73, 82, 83, 84, 95, 80, 79, 83, 84, 95, 80, 77,
> 68, 73, 78, 72, 95, 80, 82, 73, 32, 42]
>
> Preface String: [95, 70, 73, 82, 83, 84, 95, 80, 79, 83, 84, 95, 80, 77,
> 68, 73, 78, 72, 95, 80, 82, 73, 32, 42]
>
> 1.2) Workaround case with a blank request (Success Case)
>
> Preface String: [80, 82, 73, 32, 42, 32, 72, 84, 84, 80, 47, 50, 46, 48,
> 13, 10, 13, 10, 83, 77, 13, 10, 13, 10]
>
> Preface String: [80, 82, 73, 32, 42, 32, 72, 84, 84, 80, 47, 50, 46, 48,
> 13, 10, 13, 10, 83, 77, 13, 10, 13, 10]
>
> Preface String: [80, 82, 73, 32, 42, 32, 72, 84, 84, 80, 47, 50, 46, 48,
> 13, 10, 13, 10, 83, 77, 13, 10, 13, 10]
>
> 2) LOGS
> 2.1) Post Request without blank request :We get the error "an error
> occurred processing a frame": Failed to complete the connection preface
> from Liberty server and GOAWAY Exception.
>
> [9/7/23, 15:41:10:595 IST] 00000058 id=00000000
> com.ibm.ws.http.channel.h2internal.FrameReadProcessor 3
> checkConnectionPreface: processNextFrame-: stream: 0 frame type: Magic
> Preface direction: READ_IN H2InboundLink hc: 101118290
>
> [9/7/23, 15:41:10:595 IST] 00000058 id=00000000
> com.ibm.ws.http.channel.h2internal.FrameReadProcessor 3
> checkConnectionPreface: Preface String: [95, 70, 73, 82, 83, 84, 95, 80,
> 79, 83, 84, 95, 80, 77, 68, 73, 78, 72, 95, 80, 82, 73, 32, 42]
>
> [9/7/23, 15:41:10:595 IST] 00000058 id=00000000
> SystemOut O PMDINH,
> FrameReadProcessor CHECKPOINT 2, throw new ProtocolException ---
> Connection preface/magic was invalid
>
> [9/7/23, 15:41:10:595 IST] 00000058 id=00000000
> SystemOut O PMDINH,
> FrameReadProcessor CHECKPOINT 3, throw new ProtocolException ---
> Cconnection preface
>
> [9/7/23, 15:41:10:595 IST] 00000058 id=00000000
> com.ibm.ws.http.channel.h2internal.H2InboundLink 3
> processRead: an error occurred processing a frame: Failed to complete
> the connection preface
>
> [9/7/23, 15:41:10:595 IST] 00000058 id=00000000
> com.ibm.ws.http.channel.h2internal.H2InboundLink 3
> close(vc,e): :linkstatus: is: INIT :close: H2InboundLink hc:
> 101118290exception:
> com.ibm.ws.http.channel.h2internal.exceptions.ProtocolException: Failed
> to complete the connection preface
>
> 2.2) Workaround case with a blank request
>
> [9/7/23, 15:54:21:528 IST] 0000005a id=00000000
> com.ibm.ws.http.channel.h2internal.FrameReadProcessor 3
> checkConnectionPreface: processNextFrame-: stream: 0 frame type: Magic
> Preface direction: READ_IN H2InboundLink hc: 551136004
>
> [9/7/23, 15:54:21:528 IST] 0000005a id=00000000
> com.ibm.ws.http.channel.h2internal.FrameReadProcessor 3
> checkConnectionPreface: Preface String: [80, 82, 73, 32, 42, 32, 72, 84,
> 84, 80, 47, 50, 46, 48, 13, 10, 13, 10, 83, 77, 13, 10, 13, 10]
>
> [9/7/23, 15:54:21:528 IST] 0000005a id=00000000
> com.ibm.ws.http.channel.h2internal.H2InboundLink 3
> createNewInboundLink entry: stream-id: 0
>
> [9/7/23, 15:54:21:528 IST] 0000005a id=00000000
> com.ibm.ws.http.channel.internal.inbound.HttpInboundLink
>
> Please let us to know whether it is an expected behavior or an issue?
> Or is there a way to handle such scenarios?
>
> Thanks & Regards,
>
> Asha H Sunagar
>
> IGA - JTC | Global Business Services – IBM
>
> Phone: +91 8884256034
>
> Email : asha.sunagar at ibm.com <mailto:asha.sunagar at ibm.com>
>
More information about the net-dev
mailing list