RFR: 8272875: Change the default key manager to PKIX [v2]
Sean Mullan
mullan at openjdk.org
Tue Apr 29 20:01:50 UTC 2025
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 18:30:00 GMT, Artur Barashev <abarashev at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> The current key manager is SunX509, which is configured in the java.security. The SunX509 algorithm does not check the local certificate. The PKIX algorithm should be preferred now so that the default key manager could be more robust.
>>
>> Compatibility considerations:
>>
>> 1) Customers using local certificates signed using algorithms prohibited by the default configuration (notably MD5 and SHA1) no longer will be able to use such certificates without modifying algorithm constraints in `java.security` config file.
>>
>> 2) Performance impact: there is about x2 performance decrease for full (non-resume) TLS handshake:
>>
>> **SUNX509**
>> Benchmark (resume) (tlsVersion) Mode Cnt Score Error Units
>> SSLHandshake.doHandshake true TLSv1.2 thrpt 15 19758.012 ± 758.237 ops/s
>> SSLHandshake.doHandshake true TLS thrpt 15 1861.695 ± 14.681 ops/s
>> SSLHandshake.doHandshake false TLSv1.2 thrpt 15 **1186.962** ± 12.085 ops/s
>> SSLHandshake.doHandshake false TLS thrpt 15 **1056.288** ± 7.197 ops/s
>> Finished running test 'micro:java.security.SSLHandshake'
>>
>> **PKIX**
>> Benchmark (resume) (tlsVersion) Mode Cnt Score Error Units
>> SSLHandshake.doHandshake true TLSv1.2 thrpt 15 19724.887 ± 393.636 ops/s
>> SSLHandshake.doHandshake true TLS thrpt 15 1848.927 ± 22.946 ops/s
>> SSLHandshake.doHandshake false TLSv1.2 thrpt 15 **511.684** ± 5.405 ops/s
>> SSLHandshake.doHandshake false TLS thrpt 15 **490.698** ± 6.453 ops/s
>> Finished running test 'micro:java.security.SSLHandshake'
>
> Artur Barashev has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Skip explicit KeyPair initialization and let the provider default set it
test/jdk/javax/rmi/ssl/SSLSocketParametersTest.java line 52:
> 50:
> 51: public class SSLSocketParametersTest extends SSLContextTemplate implements
> 52: Serializable {
As an aside, I can't see any reason this test needs to implement Serializable, as nothing in the test depends on it or tests it. I removed it locally and the test still passes. Consider removing it as a cleanup (but if you do, run it thru mach5 to be safe).
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24756#discussion_r2067282326
More information about the net-dev
mailing list