RFR: 8357639: DigestEchoClient fails intermittently due to: java.io.IOException: Data received while in pool [v4]
Daniel Fuchs
dfuchs at openjdk.org
Tue Jun 10 09:54:48 UTC 2025
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 07:03:06 GMT, Daniel Jeliński <djelinski at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Daniel Fuchs has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains eight additional commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Merge branch 'master' into DigestEchoClient-cleanup-8357639
>> - Logging
>> - A better fix
>> - Merge branch 'master' into DigestEchoClient-cleanup-8357639
>> - Access pendingSubscriptions only from InternalReadSubscriptionImpl - and synchronize offer/handle to avoid concurrent removal from the queue
>> - Merge branch 'master' into DigestEchoClient-cleanup-8357639
>> - Avoid unnecessary volatile reads
>> - 8357639
>
> src/java.net.http/share/classes/jdk/internal/net/http/SocketTube.java line 931:
>
>> 929: synchronized void offer(TubeSubscriber sub) {
>> 930: ReadSubscription target = new ReadSubscription(this, sub);
>> 931: ReadSubscription previous = pendingSubscriptions.getAndSet(target);
>
> now that all access to pendingSubscription is synchronized, it doesn't need to be an AtomicReference, a regular field will work just as well.
Ah, good point. But it makes it possible to use getAndSet(). I'm inclined to keep it just for that.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25416#discussion_r2137417591
More information about the net-dev
mailing list