RFR: 8372198: Avoid closing PlainHttpConnection while holding a lock [v4]
Volkan Yazici
vyazici at openjdk.org
Tue Nov 25 09:38:46 UTC 2025
On Mon, 24 Nov 2025 19:53:39 GMT, Daniel Fuchs <dfuchs at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> An experimental change to SelectorManager::shutdown unveiled a potential deadlock between the SelectorManager thread trying to stop the HttpClientImpl, and an executor thread concurrently trying to return a connection to the pool.
>>
>> The issue seems to be caused by the ConnectionPool::returnToPool trying to close the returned connection when stopping, while holding the ConnectionPool state lock, and the SelectorManager thread trying to close a pooled connection, holding the connection stateLock and trying to close the channel, which caused the CleanupTrigger to fire and attempt to remove the connection from the pool.
>>
>> This problem was observed once with the java/net/httpclient/ThrowingSubscribersAsLimitingAsync.java test.
>>
>> To avoid the problem, the proposed fix is to wait until the ConnectionPool::stateLock has been released before actually closing the connection, and to wait until the PlainHttpConnection::stateLock has been released before actually closing the channel. Indeed, there should be no need to close those while holding the lock.
>>
>> This PR was recreated due to a bad merge pushed to https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/28421
>
> Daniel Fuchs has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains eight commits:
>
> - Merge branch 'master' into ConnectionCloseLock-8372198
> - Merge master
> - 8372198: Avoid closing PlainHttpConnection while holding a lock
> - Merge branch 'master' into SelectorManagerVT-8372159
> - Copyright years
> - Review feedback on test
> - Revert changes to SelectorManager::shutdown
> - 8372159: HttpClient SelectorManager thread could be a VirtualThread
src/java.net.http/share/classes/jdk/internal/net/http/PlainHttpConnection.java line 321:
> 319: }
> 320: try {
> 321: tube.signalClosed(errorRef.get());
Shouldn't `errorRef.get()` be invoked in the synchronized block to ensure that the obtained `Throwable` is due to just executed lines above, and not overridden by a subsequent action?
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28430#discussion_r2559267566
More information about the net-dev
mailing list