Erroneous JavaDoc for Path#register

[Alan Bateman]

Matthias Ernst wrote:
> :
> Yeah! work work. Haven't had a lot of time for other engagements lately :-(
>   
Too bad!


> :
> Aww snap. That is indeed misleading. Especially given that only one of
> the overloads is re-specified in Path.java . To be consequent, both
> should be present in Path or none.
>   
You are right. Since we need to overload the description in Path then we 
re-specify both methods (and move the usage example to the other 
method). I'll do that shortly. Thanks for finding this.

-Alan.