boolean isOther()
Alan Bateman
Alan.Bateman at Sun.COM
Fri Jul 3 00:39:19 PDT 2009
Martin Buchholz wrote:
> Alan,
> Thanks for pushing me to become a nio2 contributor.
>
> Changes are at:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/symbolic-link/
>
> You know the drill. Please file a bug and review.
>
I've created:
6857287: (file) Clarifications for symbolic link related javadoc
You might as well push this directly to jdk7/tl/jdk. The repository is
open for b68.
In the previous mail, I did suggest pushing to nio/nio/jdk but I didn't
explain that the change-sets pushed to that repository don't flow to
jdk7/tl. Instead, I've been letting any fixes accumulate and bake before
pushing them to jdk7/tl in batch (with a bugID, new changeset, etc.). In
time the nio/nio forest will go away.
> Synopsis: Clarifications for symbolic link related specs
> Description:
> Use "symbolic link" instead of "link" where that might be clearer.
> Consistently use "symbolic link" instead of "symbolic-link".
> Minor wording improvements.
>
> You might want to blenderrev this to better review it.
>
The webrev is fine, and arguably easier, esp. for cases where you've
made the lines fit better into 80 columns (impossible to see that with
blenderrev).
- All the s/symbolic-link/symbolic link/ replacements look good to me.
- The s/link/symbolic link/ replacements are okay. The style I had been
using in these lengthy paragraphs was to use "symbolic link" in the
first usage, and "link" in second and subsequent usage. Changing it to
symbolic link everywhere is more consistent.
- Other misc. typos look okay.
Thanks for doing this.
-Alan.
More information about the nio-dev
mailing list