jdk7-b64 has new dependency on glibc-2.4

[Alan Bateman]

Martin Buchholz wrote:
> :
> (This nano-discussion is independent of the change being reviewed)
>
> I might be missing something, but I want to be able to build
> on pre-AT_SYSCALLS systems and the resulting binaries
> would take advantage of the newer sycalls where available,
> so just "run time".
>   
Okay, you've convinced me, the comment is changed to "run time".

> ---
>
> Another nano-gripe: I would not call these SYSCALLS,
> although they are likely to be implemented as such.
> Maybe call these something like POSIX_2008_AT_FUNCTIONS.
>   
That is a better name, let's rename it when next visiting this code.

-Alan.