Give default value of O_NOFOLLOW if it is not defined

[Alan Bateman]

On 28/12/2011 06:34, Charles Lee wrote:
> Hi net and nio,
>
> I would like to propose a fix[1] which give the default value of 
> O_NOFOLLOW if, one some platforms, O_NOFOLLOW is not defined. Would 
> anyone help to review this fix?
>
> [1]: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~littlee/OJDK-226/webrev.00/ 
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Elittlee/OJDK-226/webrev.00/>
>
Charles - your patch will get over a build issue on platforms where 
O_NOFOLLOW isn't supported but will mean that NOFOLLOW is ignored at 
runtime. In order to allow for this it will require changes in several 
places so that UOE is thrown as expected. I'm on vacation this week but 
will reply next week with more details.

-Alan